Maybe I'm missing the point with these recommendations? Tell me if I am.
First up is facto.me, which is actually the brainchild of Kyle Bragger, the founder of Forrst. You can add a random fact about yourself and rate other people's random facts as one of the following:
- Knew that!
- Didn't know that
- Me too!
- Awesome
- Whoa
- Weird!
- Boring
- No way
And that would be Wordr, which sells itself as "like Twitter", except you can only post up one word that's less than 28 letters long. Oh, and it doesn't even have to be a real word either, you could post up "euswofbg" if you so wish. Although, we all know *that* means "what a pointless website". I could see the appeal if it was a word association game, maybe, but it just seems to be people posting up random words for no purpose whatsoever.
Maybe I'm missing the point with these two, but somehow I don't think I am. Has anyone else used these and found them of interest?
Wordr looks ridiculous. What's the point!?
ReplyDeleteAgree - Wordr is a bit odd (unless it's actually satire on the banality of some Twitter updates).
ReplyDeleteThe only interesting feature I can really see is usage which, if they had the traffic and number of updates of Twitter, could potentially provide insights.
Glad to see it's not just me who is struggling with the point of Wordr!
ReplyDelete